- Insolvency Insider UK
- Posts
- El-Husseiny v Invest Bank – expanding office holder claims?
El-Husseiny v Invest Bank – expanding office holder claims?

Chris Paschali of Squire Patton Boggs explains how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in El-Husseiny v Invest Bank confirmed that a debtor does not need to legally or beneficially own an asset for a transaction to be caught under s423, s238 and s339 of the Insolvency Act 1986.